A Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill.
Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.
This is stunning!
The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system.
All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated.
If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital.
All of this is protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you.
It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.
However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights.
Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress, I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
AFTER HAVING READ THIS, PLEASE FORWARD....
Showing posts with label Blog Updates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blog Updates. Show all posts
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Viral of the Day: take a guess, it's in the news now...
A Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill.
Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.
This is stunning!
The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system.
All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated.
If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital.
All of this is protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you.
It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.
However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights.
Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress, I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
AFTER HAVING READ THIS, PLEASE FORWARD....
Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.
This is stunning!
The Truth About the Health Care Bills - Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system.
All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated.
If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare in direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital.
All of this is protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures.. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you.
It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.
However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.
I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights.
Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress, I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
AFTER HAVING READ THIS, PLEASE FORWARD....
Monday, March 15, 2010
FL Tea Party Candidate to be vetted on 850AM WFTL tomorrow
vetted on the Joyce Kauffman Show on News-Talk 850 AM out of Ft. Lauderdale tomorrow, 3/16/10 at 2pm. EST. I posted an interview of Mike here about a month and a half ago. His opponents were sent e-mail invitations to answer the same questions and did not reply. For those of you from out of state, rest assured, Mike will give a colorful insight into the state of local politics in our State. Over the last week, we have gotten a wonderful picture from KOOK and Clay at Bungallo Bill's regarding local politics in the S.W. Missouri area. Lameyer is running as a "conservative" a.k.a. "tea party" Republican for State Senate district 27. I talked to Mike in depth before deciding to support him and I really appreciate his upfront approach to politics. His style is a refreshing change to those who tend to "dance around" questions such as Massa on Beck last week. 850AM. I will post links to the radio station and the Joyce Kauffman show is both syndicated and I believe is available by internet radio and I believe is available on XM satellite radio. 
You can go to Mike's website here:http://www.mikelameyer.com/index.htm
FL Tea Party Candidate to be vetted on 850AM WFTL tomorrow
vetted on the Joyce Kauffman Show on News-Talk 850 AM out of Ft. Lauderdale tomorrow, 3/16/10 at 2pm. EST. I posted an interview of Mike here about a month and a half ago. His opponents were sent e-mail invitations to answer the same questions and did not reply. For those of you from out of state, rest assured, Mike will give a colorful insight into the state of local politics in our State. Over the last week, we have gotten a wonderful picture from KOOK and Clay at Bungallo Bill's regarding local politics in the S.W. Missouri area. Lameyer is running as a "conservative" a.k.a. "tea party" Republican for State Senate district 27. I talked to Mike in depth before deciding to support him and I really appreciate his upfront approach to politics. His style is a refreshing change to those who tend to "dance around" questions such as Massa on Beck last week. 850AM. I will post links to the radio station and the Joyce Kauffman show is both syndicated and I believe is available by internet radio and I believe is available on XM satellite radio. You can go to Mike's website here:http://www.mikelameyer.com/index.htm
Saturday, March 13, 2010
VIRAL OF THE DAY: The Obamas:Lawyers or not????
I am posting this, neither confirming nor denying the accuracy of this viral E-mail I received earlier. I am not trying to dredge up the whole "birther" craziness. Where I think far greater questions lie regarding the obama family regarding their supposed education. I have pointed out many times that info that should be available to the public regarding the Bar Exam to get a law degree such as test scores and number of times the exam was taken by a specific attorney. With both mr. and mrs. obama, such info is not only not available, it simply doesn't exist. On top of that, there is nobody who even claims to remember attending school with either mr. or mrs. obama. So I ask you the readers to dig into this for yourselves. Don't take my word, nor the word of this viral, but instead do some fact finding on your own, and if you can find the info that I have been unable to locate, I will be happy to post your findings. So please look at this, look at the evidence, and decide for yourselves what you think. Read, Question, Think...
May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo
I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.
But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:
She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.
Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.
And he renews his medical license every two years, too.
I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.
But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:
"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.
This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.
Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.
As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.
As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.
So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.
There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !
A Lawyer or NOT a Lawyer?
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address
Consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.
2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/
4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???
When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.
Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address
Consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.
2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/
4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???
When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.
Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?
May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo
I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.
But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:
She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.
Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.
And he renews his medical license every two years, too.
I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.
But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:
"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.
This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.
Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.
As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.
As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.
So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.
There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !
VIRAL OF THE DAY: The Obamas:Lawyers or not????
I am posting this, neither confirming nor denying the accuracy of this viral E-mail I received earlier. I am not trying to dredge up the whole "birther" craziness. Where I think far greater questions lie regarding the obama family regarding their supposed education. I have pointed out many times that info that should be available to the public regarding the Bar Exam to get a law degree such as test scores and number of times the exam was taken by a specific attorney. With both mr. and mrs. obama, such info is not only not available, it simply doesn't exist. On top of that, there is nobody who even claims to remember attending school with either mr. or mrs. obama. So I ask you the readers to dig into this for yourselves. Don't take my word, nor the word of this viral, but instead do some fact finding on your own, and if you can find the info that I have been unable to locate, I will be happy to post your findings. So please look at this, look at the evidence, and decide for yourselves what you think. Read, Question, Think...
May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo
I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.
But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:
She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.
Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.
And he renews his medical license every two years, too.
I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.
But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:
"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.
This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.
Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.
As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.
As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.
So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.
There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !
A Lawyer or NOT a Lawyer?
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address
Consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.
2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/
4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???
When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.
Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address
Consider this:
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.
2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/
4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???
When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.
Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?
May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo
I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.
But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:
She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.
Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.
And he renews his medical license every two years, too.
I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.
But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:
"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.
This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.
Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.
As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.
As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.
So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.
There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !
Monday, February 22, 2010
A message from Karin (organizer of the 912/RNC meeting)
As many of you know, a local 912er, Karin Hoffman who co-organized the local DC works for US movement here locally and used her magic to set up a meeting between 912 leaders and RNC leaders has a message for you. I am proud to call her a colleague and someone who has inspired me to expand my voice from just here on the internet into local politics itself. I hope that Karin will inspire you to do the same. As I have found out, you can have a profound impact on local politics, which unlike economics, has a "trickle up effect." So Here's Karin:
Dear Patriots, (7 items, Grassroots Meeting with Steele, CPAC, Healthcare Summit, National Congressional Race, Ed Lynch, DC Works For Us Meetings, Tea Party, and Ed Lynch Rally)
1) Meeting with RNC and CPAC Report (come join us on Thursday, Feb. 25th at Wings Plus in Coral Springs for firsthand report on the events of this past week)
What an amazing week in Washington DC! Following our meeting with Chairman Steele of the Republican National Committee, many of us from the meeting were able to connect up again at CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference.
The consensus of those who attended the meeting with Steele were very encouraged as they each felt that the leaders were genuinely heard by the Chairman.
Interview with Greta on Fox News
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4021118/tea-party-group-reaches-out?playlist_id=87249
Interview with John Roberts on CNN
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/18/tea-party-organizer-not-for-a-third-party/?fbid=KOrNP4BMLuu
An incredible moment for me was driving to the very meeting with Chairman Steele. On the way there, the Capitol building itself comes into view. It was then I could see with clarity that we all were truly making DC Work For Us.
At CPAC, we had a phenomenal opportunity to connect with many other solid grassroots organizations to forge together alliances. By doing so, our efforts and energies become the very tool that will penetrate what has, up to this point, seemed impenetrable.
Florida's great candidates, Rubio, Lynch, and West, spoke at CPAC. Lynch and Lowry spoke at XPAC, also.
2) Health Care Summit at the Blair House
This is one proposal we gave the RNC this past Tuesday. We want the Republicans to show up to the Summit. See with their own eyes the proposal of the Democrats. With all the media that is surrounding this event, take advantage of it and walk out in protest to the
un-Constitutional legislation that is proposed. Hard to imagine that it is otherwise.
Call to Action: Let the RNC know that you want the Republicans to go and to be bold for us. Stand up against the atrocious legislation.
RNC 202.863.8500
More Call to Action: If you are local to Washington DC, please make every attempt to join the forces that will be there to protest the bill and support those who make a stand against it. Bring the shredder.
3) We need your help in turning over a seat in District 19, the next Scott Brown election. Edward Lynch is the candidate that is running against the Obama machine in District 19 of Florida. Please contact www.electlynch.com to help.
4) New DC Works For Us meetings throughout the nation
Many have asked how to start a DC Works For Us Meeting in their area. If that is what you are considering, please let us know and we can help equip you on how to have an effective force in your area.
5) Join your local Executive Committee Meetings of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Now is not the time for a Third Party. Get off the sidelines and make a difference from within the existing structure. Elections are only 8 month away. To develop a third party would ensure victory for this administration and its agenda.
6) DC Works For Us Meetings times and locations this week are located at:
Dade: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Original Pancake House Aventura
21215 Biscayne Blvd, Aventura, FL 33180
Palm Beach: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Dominics 9834 W. Glades Road Boca Raton (next to Home Depot on the SE corner of 441 and Glades Road)
Broward: Thursday, Feb. 25th 7-9pm (Firsthand report on meeting with Steele)
Wings Plus Coral Springs
9880 Sample Road Coral Springs FL 33067
7) Tea Party Rally Saturday, Feb. 27th 3:00-5:00pm on Oakland Park Blvd and Federal Hwy.
Check your local listings for rallies throughout the nation
8) Sunday, Feb. 28th 2:00pm Rally for Ed Lynch in Coral Springs. More details to follow.
District 19 of Florida, the next national race.
Check out the gear that is available to remind DC that they work for us.
Again, a phenomenal week. Thank you for all the encouragement each of you have given us as we work together to make DC Work For Us.
Karin Hoffman and the outstanding DC Works For Us team
Join me on Facebook
1) Meeting with RNC and CPAC Report (come join us on Thursday, Feb. 25th at Wings Plus in Coral Springs for firsthand report on the events of this past week)
What an amazing week in Washington DC! Following our meeting with Chairman Steele of the Republican National Committee, many of us from the meeting were able to connect up again at CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference.
The consensus of those who attended the meeting with Steele were very encouraged as they each felt that the leaders were genuinely heard by the Chairman.
Interview with Greta on Fox News
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4021118/tea-party-group-reaches-out?playlist_id=87249
Interview with John Roberts on CNN
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/18/tea-party-organizer-not-for-a-third-party/?fbid=KOrNP4BMLuu
An incredible moment for me was driving to the very meeting with Chairman Steele. On the way there, the Capitol building itself comes into view. It was then I could see with clarity that we all were truly making DC Work For Us.
At CPAC, we had a phenomenal opportunity to connect with many other solid grassroots organizations to forge together alliances. By doing so, our efforts and energies become the very tool that will penetrate what has, up to this point, seemed impenetrable.
Florida's great candidates, Rubio, Lynch, and West, spoke at CPAC. Lynch and Lowry spoke at XPAC, also.
2) Health Care Summit at the Blair House
This is one proposal we gave the RNC this past Tuesday. We want the Republicans to show up to the Summit. See with their own eyes the proposal of the Democrats. With all the media that is surrounding this event, take advantage of it and walk out in protest to the
un-Constitutional legislation that is proposed. Hard to imagine that it is otherwise.
Call to Action: Let the RNC know that you want the Republicans to go and to be bold for us. Stand up against the atrocious legislation.
RNC 202.863.8500
More Call to Action: If you are local to Washington DC, please make every attempt to join the forces that will be there to protest the bill and support those who make a stand against it. Bring the shredder.
3) We need your help in turning over a seat in District 19, the next Scott Brown election. Edward Lynch is the candidate that is running against the Obama machine in District 19 of Florida. Please contact www.electlynch.com to help.
4) New DC Works For Us meetings throughout the nation
Many have asked how to start a DC Works For Us Meeting in their area. If that is what you are considering, please let us know and we can help equip you on how to have an effective force in your area.
5) Join your local Executive Committee Meetings of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Now is not the time for a Third Party. Get off the sidelines and make a difference from within the existing structure. Elections are only 8 month away. To develop a third party would ensure victory for this administration and its agenda.
6) DC Works For Us Meetings times and locations this week are located at:
Dade: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Original Pancake House Aventura
21215 Biscayne Blvd, Aventura, FL 33180
Palm Beach: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Dominics 9834 W. Glades Road Boca Raton (next to Home Depot on the SE corner of 441 and Glades Road)
Broward: Thursday, Feb. 25th 7-9pm (Firsthand report on meeting with Steele)
Wings Plus Coral Springs
9880 Sample Road Coral Springs FL 33067
7) Tea Party Rally Saturday, Feb. 27th 3:00-5:00pm on Oakland Park Blvd and Federal Hwy.
Check your local listings for rallies throughout the nation
8) Sunday, Feb. 28th 2:00pm Rally for Ed Lynch in Coral Springs. More details to follow.
District 19 of Florida, the next national race.
Check out the gear that is available to remind DC that they work for us.
Again, a phenomenal week. Thank you for all the encouragement each of you have given us as we work together to make DC Work For Us.
Karin Hoffman and the outstanding DC Works For Us team
Join me on Facebook
As you can see...busy week ahead for me!!!!!
A message from Karin (organizer of the 912/RNC meeting)
As many of you know, a local 912er, Karin Hoffman who co-organized the local DC works for US movement here locally and used her magic to set up a meeting between 912 leaders and RNC leaders has a message for you. I am proud to call her a colleague and someone who has inspired me to expand my voice from just here on the internet into local politics itself. I hope that Karin will inspire you to do the same. As I have found out, you can have a profound impact on local politics, which unlike economics, has a "trickle up effect." So Here's Karin:
Dear Patriots, (7 items, Grassroots Meeting with Steele, CPAC, Healthcare Summit, National Congressional Race, Ed Lynch, DC Works For Us Meetings, Tea Party, and Ed Lynch Rally)
1) Meeting with RNC and CPAC Report (come join us on Thursday, Feb. 25th at Wings Plus in Coral Springs for firsthand report on the events of this past week)
What an amazing week in Washington DC! Following our meeting with Chairman Steele of the Republican National Committee, many of us from the meeting were able to connect up again at CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference.
The consensus of those who attended the meeting with Steele were very encouraged as they each felt that the leaders were genuinely heard by the Chairman.
Interview with Greta on Fox News
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4021118/tea-party-group-reaches-out?playlist_id=87249
Interview with John Roberts on CNN
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/18/tea-party-organizer-not-for-a-third-party/?fbid=KOrNP4BMLuu
An incredible moment for me was driving to the very meeting with Chairman Steele. On the way there, the Capitol building itself comes into view. It was then I could see with clarity that we all were truly making DC Work For Us.
At CPAC, we had a phenomenal opportunity to connect with many other solid grassroots organizations to forge together alliances. By doing so, our efforts and energies become the very tool that will penetrate what has, up to this point, seemed impenetrable.
Florida's great candidates, Rubio, Lynch, and West, spoke at CPAC. Lynch and Lowry spoke at XPAC, also.
2) Health Care Summit at the Blair House
This is one proposal we gave the RNC this past Tuesday. We want the Republicans to show up to the Summit. See with their own eyes the proposal of the Democrats. With all the media that is surrounding this event, take advantage of it and walk out in protest to the
un-Constitutional legislation that is proposed. Hard to imagine that it is otherwise.
Call to Action: Let the RNC know that you want the Republicans to go and to be bold for us. Stand up against the atrocious legislation.
RNC 202.863.8500
More Call to Action: If you are local to Washington DC, please make every attempt to join the forces that will be there to protest the bill and support those who make a stand against it. Bring the shredder.
3) We need your help in turning over a seat in District 19, the next Scott Brown election. Edward Lynch is the candidate that is running against the Obama machine in District 19 of Florida. Please contact www.electlynch.com to help.
4) New DC Works For Us meetings throughout the nation
Many have asked how to start a DC Works For Us Meeting in their area. If that is what you are considering, please let us know and we can help equip you on how to have an effective force in your area.
5) Join your local Executive Committee Meetings of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Now is not the time for a Third Party. Get off the sidelines and make a difference from within the existing structure. Elections are only 8 month away. To develop a third party would ensure victory for this administration and its agenda.
6) DC Works For Us Meetings times and locations this week are located at:
Dade: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Original Pancake House Aventura
21215 Biscayne Blvd, Aventura, FL 33180
Palm Beach: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Dominics 9834 W. Glades Road Boca Raton (next to Home Depot on the SE corner of 441 and Glades Road)
Broward: Thursday, Feb. 25th 7-9pm (Firsthand report on meeting with Steele)
Wings Plus Coral Springs
9880 Sample Road Coral Springs FL 33067
7) Tea Party Rally Saturday, Feb. 27th 3:00-5:00pm on Oakland Park Blvd and Federal Hwy.
Check your local listings for rallies throughout the nation
8) Sunday, Feb. 28th 2:00pm Rally for Ed Lynch in Coral Springs. More details to follow.
District 19 of Florida, the next national race.
Check out the gear that is available to remind DC that they work for us.
Again, a phenomenal week. Thank you for all the encouragement each of you have given us as we work together to make DC Work For Us.
Karin Hoffman and the outstanding DC Works For Us team
Join me on Facebook
1) Meeting with RNC and CPAC Report (come join us on Thursday, Feb. 25th at Wings Plus in Coral Springs for firsthand report on the events of this past week)
What an amazing week in Washington DC! Following our meeting with Chairman Steele of the Republican National Committee, many of us from the meeting were able to connect up again at CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference.
The consensus of those who attended the meeting with Steele were very encouraged as they each felt that the leaders were genuinely heard by the Chairman.
Interview with Greta on Fox News
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4021118/tea-party-group-reaches-out?playlist_id=87249
Interview with John Roberts on CNN
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/18/tea-party-organizer-not-for-a-third-party/?fbid=KOrNP4BMLuu
An incredible moment for me was driving to the very meeting with Chairman Steele. On the way there, the Capitol building itself comes into view. It was then I could see with clarity that we all were truly making DC Work For Us.
At CPAC, we had a phenomenal opportunity to connect with many other solid grassroots organizations to forge together alliances. By doing so, our efforts and energies become the very tool that will penetrate what has, up to this point, seemed impenetrable.
Florida's great candidates, Rubio, Lynch, and West, spoke at CPAC. Lynch and Lowry spoke at XPAC, also.
2) Health Care Summit at the Blair House
This is one proposal we gave the RNC this past Tuesday. We want the Republicans to show up to the Summit. See with their own eyes the proposal of the Democrats. With all the media that is surrounding this event, take advantage of it and walk out in protest to the
un-Constitutional legislation that is proposed. Hard to imagine that it is otherwise.
Call to Action: Let the RNC know that you want the Republicans to go and to be bold for us. Stand up against the atrocious legislation.
RNC 202.863.8500
More Call to Action: If you are local to Washington DC, please make every attempt to join the forces that will be there to protest the bill and support those who make a stand against it. Bring the shredder.
3) We need your help in turning over a seat in District 19, the next Scott Brown election. Edward Lynch is the candidate that is running against the Obama machine in District 19 of Florida. Please contact www.electlynch.com to help.
4) New DC Works For Us meetings throughout the nation
Many have asked how to start a DC Works For Us Meeting in their area. If that is what you are considering, please let us know and we can help equip you on how to have an effective force in your area.
5) Join your local Executive Committee Meetings of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Now is not the time for a Third Party. Get off the sidelines and make a difference from within the existing structure. Elections are only 8 month away. To develop a third party would ensure victory for this administration and its agenda.
6) DC Works For Us Meetings times and locations this week are located at:
Dade: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Original Pancake House Aventura
21215 Biscayne Blvd, Aventura, FL 33180
Palm Beach: Tuesday, Feb. 23rd 7-9pm
Dominics 9834 W. Glades Road Boca Raton (next to Home Depot on the SE corner of 441 and Glades Road)
Broward: Thursday, Feb. 25th 7-9pm (Firsthand report on meeting with Steele)
Wings Plus Coral Springs
9880 Sample Road Coral Springs FL 33067
7) Tea Party Rally Saturday, Feb. 27th 3:00-5:00pm on Oakland Park Blvd and Federal Hwy.
Check your local listings for rallies throughout the nation
8) Sunday, Feb. 28th 2:00pm Rally for Ed Lynch in Coral Springs. More details to follow.
District 19 of Florida, the next national race.
Check out the gear that is available to remind DC that they work for us.
Again, a phenomenal week. Thank you for all the encouragement each of you have given us as we work together to make DC Work For Us.
Karin Hoffman and the outstanding DC Works For Us team
Join me on Facebook
As you can see...busy week ahead for me!!!!!
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
DC Tea party/RNC update
Apparently the meeting between the RNC and Tea Party leaders from all over the country went well. The meeting, planned to last an hour lasted over 2. Michael Steele seemed quite conciliatory and was willing to take as many questions as the Tea Party reps could ask. Karin Hoffman, my friend from "DC works for US" who put this whole thing together opened on Greta on Fox and said she was quite happy with the results of the meeting. She swore that the "Tea Party" movement will not be co-opted by any political party and will never have an official leader as the members themselves are the leaders and that is how it will remain. That is my opinion as well so I am quite satisfied with the results of the meeting. If any of you want to send a message thanking Karin for all the work it took to organize this, I will be happy to relay them.
DC Tea party/RNC update
Apparently the meeting between the RNC and Tea Party leaders from all over the country went well. The meeting, planned to last an hour lasted over 2. Michael Steele seemed quite conciliatory and was willing to take as many questions as the Tea Party reps could ask. Karin Hoffman, my friend from "DC works for US" who put this whole thing together opened on Greta on Fox and said she was quite happy with the results of the meeting. She swore that the "Tea Party" movement will not be co-opted by any political party and will never have an official leader as the members themselves are the leaders and that is how it will remain. That is my opinion as well so I am quite satisfied with the results of the meeting. If any of you want to send a message thanking Karin for all the work it took to organize this, I will be happy to relay them.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)
Decay:
Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.
Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained
Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.
UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.
Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.
Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.
Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.
By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)
Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.
Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.
Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of
self determination"
Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."
Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)
Decay:
Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.
Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained
Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.
UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.
Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.
Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.
Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.
By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)
Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.
Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.
Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of
self determination"
Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."
Viral of the day: REGISTER NON-GUN OWNERS!!!!
I bet you folks will LOVE this. Best idea i've heard in years!!!!!
A Novel Idea. Register non-gun owners
Posted by D. Wayne Crook on October 21, 2009 at 9:34pm
View D. Wayne Crook's blog
Subject: A Novel Idea
Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.
Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun
Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals!
Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons
who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms," shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a
constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."
Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says
Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state ..it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation!!!
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bums."
This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
Viral of the day: REGISTER NON-GUN OWNERS!!!!
I bet you folks will LOVE this. Best idea i've heard in years!!!!!
A Novel Idea. Register non-gun owners
Posted by D. Wayne Crook on October 21, 2009 at 9:34pm
View D. Wayne Crook's blog
Subject: A Novel Idea
Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.
Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun
Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals!
Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons
who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms," shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a
constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."
Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says
Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state ..it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation!!!
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bums."
This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Co-viral of the day:2009 political events
So, Let's Recap "2009".........what a year! PLEASE KEEP READING to
the end.
1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 142 days
experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state
(city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office.
The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and
make sure
terrorists civil rights are not violated.
(honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric
Holder, whose law firm we later find out, represents seventeen Gitmo
Terrorists.
(An honest mistake?!)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience,
has a daughter Linda, we find out, who is a true radical anti-American
activist and a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the
western hemisphere.(There were socio-economic factors involved!)
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as
Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a
pig, but it still stinks!)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file
his own taxes for 12 years.
(He misspoke!)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.
(Another honest mistake???)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under
charges.
(Hmmm... another screw-up?)
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical
conduct.
(Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of
cheating on his taxes.
(I'm running out of excuses for these idiots!!)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute
campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed.
(Dear God, I am getting a headache!)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . but who's
counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges ; Barry, Nancy and
Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending!!!"
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion)
pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of
your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself
[stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new
Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!
Only with the Liberals...
Pray for our country.
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to
sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR
24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Don't you just love hypocrites?
Speaking of praying, Obama has now been president for 12 months and yet
he & wife (first lady) Michelle, the Christian family they claim to be,
have not attended church since the inauguration.
He must miss Reverend Wright!
In these times 'I'll keep my God, my freedom, my gun and my money.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep "THE CHANGE".
1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 142 days
experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state
(city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office.
The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and
make sure
terrorists civil rights are not violated.
(honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric
Holder, whose law firm we later find out, represents seventeen Gitmo
Terrorists.
(An honest mistake?!)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience,
has a daughter Linda, we find out, who is a true radical anti-American
activist and a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the
western hemisphere.(There were socio-economic factors involved!)
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as
Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a
pig, but it still stinks!)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file
his own taxes for 12 years.
(He misspoke!)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.
(Another honest mistake???)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under
charges.
(Hmmm... another screw-up?)
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical
conduct.
(Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of
cheating on his taxes.
(I'm running out of excuses for these idiots!!)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute
campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed.
(Dear God, I am getting a headache!)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . but who's
counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges ; Barry, Nancy and
Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending!!!"
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion)
pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of
your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself
[stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new
Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!
Only with the Liberals...
Pray for our country.
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to
sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR
24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Don't you just love hypocrites?
Speaking of praying, Obama has now been president for 12 months and yet
he & wife (first lady) Michelle, the Christian family they claim to be,
have not attended church since the inauguration.
He must miss Reverend Wright!
In these times 'I'll keep my God, my freedom, my gun and my money.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep "THE CHANGE".
Co-viral of the day:2009 political events
So, Let's Recap "2009".........what a year! PLEASE KEEP READING to
the end.
1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 142 days
experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state
(city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office.
The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and
make sure
terrorists civil rights are not violated.
(honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric
Holder, whose law firm we later find out, represents seventeen Gitmo
Terrorists.
(An honest mistake?!)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience,
has a daughter Linda, we find out, who is a true radical anti-American
activist and a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the
western hemisphere.(There were socio-economic factors involved!)
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as
Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a
pig, but it still stinks!)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file
his own taxes for 12 years.
(He misspoke!)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.
(Another honest mistake???)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under
charges.
(Hmmm... another screw-up?)
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical
conduct.
(Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of
cheating on his taxes.
(I'm running out of excuses for these idiots!!)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute
campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed.
(Dear God, I am getting a headache!)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . but who's
counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges ; Barry, Nancy and
Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending!!!"
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion)
pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of
your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself
[stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new
Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!
Only with the Liberals...
Pray for our country.
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to
sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR
24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Don't you just love hypocrites?
Speaking of praying, Obama has now been president for 12 months and yet
he & wife (first lady) Michelle, the Christian family they claim to be,
have not attended church since the inauguration.
He must miss Reverend Wright!
In these times 'I'll keep my God, my freedom, my gun and my money.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep "THE CHANGE".
1. The American people elect a black president with a total of 142 days
experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state
(city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office.
The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and
make sure
terrorists civil rights are not violated.
(honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric
Holder, whose law firm we later find out, represents seventeen Gitmo
Terrorists.
(An honest mistake?!)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience,
has a daughter Linda, we find out, who is a true radical anti-American
activist and a supporter of all the Anti-American regimes in the
western hemisphere.(There were socio-economic factors involved!)
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as
Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a
pig, but it still stinks!)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file
his own taxes for 12 years.
(He misspoke!)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges.
(Another honest mistake???)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under
charges.
(Hmmm... another screw-up?)
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical
conduct.
(Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of
cheating on his taxes.
(I'm running out of excuses for these idiots!!)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute
campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed.
(Dear God, I am getting a headache!)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . but who's
counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges ; Barry, Nancy and
Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending!!!"
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion)
pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of
your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself
[stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new
Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!
Only with the Liberals...
Pray for our country.
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to
sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR
24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Don't you just love hypocrites?
Speaking of praying, Obama has now been president for 12 months and yet
he & wife (first lady) Michelle, the Christian family they claim to be,
have not attended church since the inauguration.
He must miss Reverend Wright!
In these times 'I'll keep my God, my freedom, my gun and my money.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep "THE CHANGE".
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Did I predict the speech correctly? You tell me.
Now read this again and tell me whether I was right about the potus-totus speech. I watched very litlle of it personally and what I saw required the rebuilding of the county sewer system as he was so full of it. I'm going to see the dentist...I love mixing pain pills with Xanax combined with laughing gas and then driving...just kidding, but seriously, I want to know how accurate a prediction my guess was. I'll do a real post later as the novacaine wears off.
Anybody who has not heard about our State of the Union address to be delivered via TOTUS is probably living in the same cave as UBL. After only a year of worthless blathering form the idiot who claims the throne, is it not perfectly obvious what the State of the Union address will be? It will be a stump speech, making lofty promises that will never be kept by fool making them. He will talk about how HIS stimulus saved the economy from depression brought on by the failed policies of Bush, but ask yourself this: Did it? when unemployment ranges from 10% at best to 50% or more at worst, does that not sound like a depression to you, because it sure does to me. Obama will talk about his failed attempt to get nationalized health care (destruction). He will blame obstructionist Republicans even though the Dems had a supermajority in the Senate and a simple majority is all that is needed in the House of Representatives. Now, every election held since Obama was crowned has gone the other way. Even in NY23 where the Dem technically won, if the votes were totaled for the opposition candidates, it was a landslide in favor of the opposition.This morning CNN is broadcasting from a union town in Ohio where the unions have driven the jobs out of town (the same unions that got sweetheart deals on car company stock and more money than our readership will will likely see in our lifetime. In that town, unemployment is 70%, but this is NOT a depression. obummer will give lofty rhetoric about bringing in jobs while the death of the Bush tax cuts will drive more companies overseas where they can make money. So obama will say he hasn't been perfect, but look at what he was handed (i.e. blaming Bush for everything wrong in America today.)
Anybody who has not heard about our State of the Union address to be delivered via TOTUS is probably living in the same cave as UBL. After only a year of worthless blathering form the idiot who claims the throne, is it not perfectly obvious what the State of the Union address will be? It will be a stump speech, making lofty promises that will never be kept by fool making them. He will talk about how HIS stimulus saved the economy from depression brought on by the failed policies of Bush, but ask yourself this: Did it? when unemployment ranges from 10% at best to 50% or more at worst, does that not sound like a depression to you, because it sure does to me. Obama will talk about his failed attempt to get nationalized health care (destruction). He will blame obstructionist Republicans even though the Dems had a supermajority in the Senate and a simple majority is all that is needed in the House of Representatives. Now, every election held since Obama was crowned has gone the other way. Even in NY23 where the Dem technically won, if the votes were totaled for the opposition candidates, it was a landslide in favor of the opposition.This morning CNN is broadcasting from a union town in Ohio where the unions have driven the jobs out of town (the same unions that got sweetheart deals on car company stock and more money than our readership will will likely see in our lifetime. In that town, unemployment is 70%, but this is NOT a depression. obummer will give lofty rhetoric about bringing in jobs while the death of the Bush tax cuts will drive more companies overseas where they can make money. So obama will say he hasn't been perfect, but look at what he was handed (i.e. blaming Bush for everything wrong in America today.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)