VIRAL OF THE DAY: The Obamas:Lawyers or not????

I am posting this, neither confirming nor denying the accuracy of this viral E-mail I received earlier. I am not trying to dredge up the whole "birther" craziness. Where I think far greater questions lie regarding the obama family regarding their supposed education. I have pointed out many times that info that should be available to the public regarding the Bar Exam to get a law degree such as test scores and number of times the exam was taken by a specific attorney. With both mr. and mrs. obama, such info is not only not available, it simply doesn't exist. On top of that, there is nobody who even claims to remember attending school with either mr. or mrs. obama. So I ask you the readers to dig into this for yourselves. Don't take my word, nor the word of this viral, but instead do some fact finding on your own, and if you can find the info that I have been unable to locate, I will be happy to post your findings. So please look at this, look at the evidence, and decide for yourselves what you think. Read, Question, Think...

A Lawyer or NOT a Lawyer?

Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address

Consider this:

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.

2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.


3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..

10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:


We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???

When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.

Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?

May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo

I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.

But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:

She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.

Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.

And he renews his medical license every two years, too.

I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.

But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:

"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.

This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.

Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.

As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.

As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.

So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.

There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !

VIRAL OF THE DAY: The Obamas:Lawyers or not????

I am posting this, neither confirming nor denying the accuracy of this viral E-mail I received earlier. I am not trying to dredge up the whole "birther" craziness. Where I think far greater questions lie regarding the obama family regarding their supposed education. I have pointed out many times that info that should be available to the public regarding the Bar Exam to get a law degree such as test scores and number of times the exam was taken by a specific attorney. With both mr. and mrs. obama, such info is not only not available, it simply doesn't exist. On top of that, there is nobody who even claims to remember attending school with either mr. or mrs. obama. So I ask you the readers to dig into this for yourselves. Don't take my word, nor the word of this viral, but instead do some fact finding on your own, and if you can find the info that I have been unable to locate, I will be happy to post your findings. So please look at this, look at the evidence, and decide for yourselves what you think. Read, Question, Think...

A Lawyer or NOT a Lawyer?

Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and US President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address

Consider this:

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. NOTE: Click on "lawyer" to see the actual documents.

2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.


3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

4. A senior lecturer is one thing.. A fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the US Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal..

10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:


We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech???

When you are a phony it's hard to keep the facts straight.

Pres. Barack Obama - Editor of the Harvard Law Review- Has No Law License ?

May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo

I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel - and that's a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.

But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licenses, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here's the results from the ARDC Website:

She "voluntarily surrendered" her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license, five seconds before the State suspends you.

Here's an illustration: I'm a nurse. At various times in my 28 years of nursing I've done other things when I got burned out; most notably a few years as a limousine driver; even an Amway salesman at one point. I always, always renewed my nursing license - simply because it's easier to send the state $49.00 a month than to pay the $200, take a test, wait six weeks, etc., etc. . . I've worked (recently) in a Nursing Home where there was an 88 year old lawyer and a 95 year old physician. Both of them still had current licenses as well. They would never DREAM of letting their licenses lapse. I happen to know there is currently in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City Indiana an inmate who is a licensed physician, convicted of murder when he chased the two burglars who entered his home and terrorized his family into the street and killed them. (And I can't say I blame him for that, either.) This physician still has an active medical license and still sees patients, writes prescriptions, etc all from inside the prison.

And he renews his medical license every two years, too.

I tried looking up why she would "Voluntarily surrender" her license, but Illinois does not have its 1993 records online.

But when I searched for "Obama", I found this:

"Voluntarily retired" - what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Lewinsky case and had to "Voluntarily Surrender" his license too.

This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn't seem to give a crap about his law license.

Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.

As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.

As in, "there's a block on that information" kind of thing.

So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law.

There's more to this story, I'm sure. I'll let you know when I find it......I suspect they are both stuffed shirt phonies and eventually, it will all unfold !

Of all the people...addendu

I am doing this as a quick mini post as I will be making a road trip across the state today to go see Glenn and Bill-O in Tampa with a litttle detour on my way to my favorite wildlife reserve in the 'glades.

If this political movement doesn't bring about massive change, the ever swelling government will crack down on us. Look at how mr. obama attacked the press in his State of HIS Union speech. That was the first time a sitting President has ever attacked the press (which has been softer on o-loser than any other potus in my lifetime). That attack, which which just like the attack on the STOTUS, gave no opportunity for rebuttal, was actually playing it really close to impeding on the Constitution which guarantees freedom of the press, and that the Supreme Court is a co-equal branch of government. The Supreme Court cannot respond, being a "nonpolitical body", yet neither above nor below the president. There are proper methods and protcols in place for the Potus to lay out his objection to what was an obscure ruling while not attacking, nor surrounding the supreme court justices with supporters to applaud while they must sit silently. Just as the press which can respond, but does not get a State of the Union address with every broadcast tv, talk radio and other media outlet focused on them in a singular manner to make to give a rebuttal. That is why the attack on the Supreme Court, and to a lesser degree the attack on the press bordered on being unconstitutional. Remember, that the President is an elected representative of, and therefore speaks for us the American People. I believe that the potus should be censured for his actions Wednesday night. Also, his speech writer should be called on to resign due to the innacuracies of the Speech regarding the actions of the Supreme Court regarding the overturning of McCain-Feingold, which, at least allowed groups such as ACORN to have an uneven playing field in the 2008 presidential campaign. I will both look into, and keep calling for a Congressional Censure regarding this matter and hope others will do the same.

Of all the people...addendu

I am doing this as a quick mini post as I will be making a road trip across the state today to go see Glenn and Bill-O in Tampa with a litttle detour on my way to my favorite wildlife reserve in the 'glades.

If this political movement doesn't bring about massive change, the ever swelling government will crack down on us. Look at how mr. obama attacked the press in his State of HIS Union speech. That was the first time a sitting President has ever attacked the press (which has been softer on o-loser than any other potus in my lifetime). That attack, which which just like the attack on the STOTUS, gave no opportunity for rebuttal, was actually playing it really close to impeding on the Constitution which guarantees freedom of the press, and that the Supreme Court is a co-equal branch of government. The Supreme Court cannot respond, being a "nonpolitical body", yet neither above nor below the president. There are proper methods and protcols in place for the Potus to lay out his objection to what was an obscure ruling while not attacking, nor surrounding the supreme court justices with supporters to applaud while they must sit silently. Just as the press which can respond, but does not get a State of the Union address with every broadcast tv, talk radio and other media outlet focused on them in a singular manner to make to give a rebuttal. That is why the attack on the Supreme Court, and to a lesser degree the attack on the press bordered on being unconstitutional. Remember, that the President is an elected representative of, and therefore speaks for us the American People. I believe that the potus should be censured for his actions Wednesday night. Also, his speech writer should be called on to resign due to the innacuracies of the Speech regarding the actions of the Supreme Court regarding the overturning of McCain-Feingold, which, at least allowed groups such as ACORN to have an uneven playing field in the 2008 presidential campaign. I will both look into, and keep calling for a Congressional Censure regarding this matter and hope others will do the same.

Of all the people...addendu

I am doing this as a quick mini post as I will be making a road trip across the state today to go see Glenn and Bill-O in Tampa with a litttle detour on my way to my favorite wildlife reserve in the 'glades.

If this political movement doesn't bring about massive change, the ever swelling government will crack down on us. Look at how mr. obama attacked the press in his State of HIS Union speech. That was the first time a sitting President has ever attacked the press (which has been softer on o-loser than any other potus in my lifetime). That attack, which which just like the attack on the STOTUS, gave no opportunity for rebuttal, was actually playing it really close to impeding on the Constitution which guarantees freedom of the press, and that the Supreme Court is a co-equal branch of government. The Supreme Court cannot respond, being a "nonpolitical body", yet neither above nor below the president. There are proper methods and protcols in place for the Potus to lay out his objection to what was an obscure ruling while not attacking, nor surrounding the supreme court justices with supporters to applaud while they must sit silently. Just as the press which can respond, but does not get a State of the Union address with every broadcast tv, talk radio and other media outlet focused on them in a singular manner to make to give a rebuttal. That is why the attack on the Supreme Court, and to a lesser degree the attack on the press bordered on being unconstitutional. Remember, that the President is an elected representative of, and therefore speaks for us the American People. I believe that the potus should be censured for his actions Wednesday night. Also, his speech writer should be called on to resign due to the innacuracies of the Speech regarding the actions of the Supreme Court regarding the overturning of McCain-Feingold, which, at least allowed groups such as ACORN to have an uneven playing field in the 2008 presidential campaign. I will both look into, and keep calling for a Congressional Censure regarding this matter and hope others will do the same.