Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)

Decay:

Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.

Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained

Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.

UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.

Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.

Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.

Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.

By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)

Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.

Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.

Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of

self determination"

Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."

Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)

Decay:

Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.

Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained

Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.

UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.

Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.

Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.

Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.

By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)

Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.

Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.

Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of

self determination"

Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."

Comrade Mao says merry Christmas

At first I thought "you have got to be kidding me". Then I thought "why does this surprise you?". And then I thought " well, if anyone needed any more proof that he is a narcissistic communist bastard, here it is; and if this don't convince you then you are a hopeless moron".
Yes, that is right, christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Mao's face. Christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Zero's face pasted pn mt. Rushmore. Read it and weep or read it and gag.

Fox News: White House Christmas Decor Featuring Mao Zedong Comes Under Fire


-Kook
via iPhone

Comrade Mao says merry Christmas

At first I thought "you have got to be kidding me". Then I thought "why does this surprise you?". And then I thought " well, if anyone needed any more proof that he is a narcissistic communist bastard, here it is; and if this don't convince you then you are a hopeless moron".
Yes, that is right, christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Mao's face. Christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Zero's face pasted pn mt. Rushmore. Read it and weep or read it and gag.

Fox News: White House Christmas Decor Featuring Mao Zedong Comes Under Fire


-Kook
via iPhone

Comrade Mao says merry Christmas

At first I thought "you have got to be kidding me". Then I thought "why does this surprise you?". And then I thought " well, if anyone needed any more proof that he is a narcissistic communist bastard, here it is; and if this don't convince you then you are a hopeless moron".
Yes, that is right, christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Mao's face. Christmas ornaments on the white house tree with chairman Zero's face pasted pn mt. Rushmore. Read it and weep or read it and gag.

Fox News: White House Christmas Decor Featuring Mao Zedong Comes Under Fire


-Kook
via iPhone

Fuel to the fire:

I know there is a question as to whether the photo on the right has been altered or not, but whether real or fake, it shows well how pResident Obama conducts himself in front of our troops. In the photo on the right, his head is sort of leaning to one side, shoulders down, forget whether he is saluting or not. It looks like he is ashamed to be there and that is not the first time I have noticed him look like that when addressing our troops (another reason I think the photo is real) However, when in front of Communist Chinese troops, he is at attention, head held high, proud to be there. These are HIS people and he shares their vision and is proud to be there with them. Does anybody else have a problem with is or am I imagining it all?

Fuel to the fire:

I know there is a question as to whether the photo on the right has been altered or not, but whether real or fake, it shows well how pResident Obama conducts himself in front of our troops. In the photo on the right, his head is sort of leaning to one side, shoulders down, forget whether he is saluting or not. It looks like he is ashamed to be there and that is not the first time I have noticed him look like that when addressing our troops (another reason I think the photo is real) However, when in front of Communist Chinese troops, he is at attention, head held high, proud to be there. These are HIS people and he shares their vision and is proud to be there with them. Does anybody else have a problem with is or am I imagining it all?

Axis of idiots

As you folks know, I am still letting my brain recover from both meds and H1N1 so my composition vacation continues for now. This was sent to me by a good friend. He hopes it will get passed around and forwarded. I hope you will help us do so.....

"The Axis of Idiots"
From the Podium:
J. D. Pendry, Retired Sergeant Major, USMC

FROM THE PODIUM

This retired USMC Sgt. Major has his Stuff together.

Jimmy Carter, you are the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home, and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You're the "runner-in-chief."

Bill Clinton, you played ring around the Lewinsky while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses to the USS Cole and the First Trade Center Bombing and Our Embassy Bombings emboldened the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately, they grew bolder, until 9/11/2001.

John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute. You lied about American Soldiers in Vietnam . Your military service, like your life, is more
fiction than fact. You've accused our military of terrorizing women and children in Iraq . You called Iraq the wrong war, wrong place, wrong time, and the same words you used to describe Vietnam . You're a fake! You want to run from Iraq and abandon the Iraqis to murderers just as you did to the Vietnamese. Iraq , like Vietnam , is another war that you were for, before you were against it.

John Murtha, you said our military was broken. You said we can't win militarily in Iraq . You accused United States Marines of cold-blooded murder without proof and said we should redeploy to Okinawa . Okinawa, John? And the Democrats call you their military expert! Are you sure you didn't suffer a traumatic brain injury while you were off building your war hero resume? You're a sad, pitiable, corrupt, and washed up old fool. You're not a Marine, sir. You wouldn't amount to a good pimple on a real Marine's ass. You're a phony and a disgrace. Run away, John.

Dick Durbin, you accused our Soldiers at Guantanamo of being Nazis, tenders of Soviet style gulags and as bad as the regime of Pol Pot, who murdered two million of his own people after your party abandoned Southeast Asia to the Communists. Now you want to abandon the Iraqis to the same fate. History was not a good teacher for you, was it? Lord help us! See Dick run.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Carl Levine, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Pat Leahy, Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, the Hollywood Leftist morons, et al, ad nauseam: Every time you stand in front of television cameras and broadcast to the Islamic Nazis that we went to war because our President lied, that the war is wrong and our Soldiers are torturers, that we should leave Iraq, you give the Islamic butchers - the same ones that tortured and mutilated American Soldiers - cause to think that we'll run away again, and all they have to do is hang on a little longer. It is inevitable that we, the infidels, will have to defeat the Islamic jihadists. Better to do it now on their turf, than later on ours after they have gained both strength and momentum.

American news media, the New York Times particularly: Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods, you become one united with the sub-human pieces of camel dung that torture and mutilate the bodies of American Soldiers. You can't strike up the courage to publish cartoons, but you can help Al Qaeda destroy my country. Actually, you are more dangerous to us than Al Qaeda is. Think about that each time you face Mecca to admire your Pulitzer.

You are America 's 'AXIS OF IDIOTS.' Your Collective Stupidity will destroy us. Self-serving politics and terrorist-abetting news scoops are more important to you than our national security or the lives of innocent civilians and Soldiers It bothers you that defending ourselves gets in the way of your elitist sport of politics and your ignorant editorializing. There is as much blood on your hands as is on the hands of murdering terrorists. Don't ever doubt that. Your frolics will only serve to extend this war as they extended Vietnam . If you want our Soldiers home as you claim, knock off the crap and try supporting your country ahead of supporting your silly political aims and aiding our enemies.

Yes, I'm questioning your patriotism. Your loyalty ends with self. I'm also questioning why you're stealing air that decent Americans could be breathing. You don't deserve the protection of our men and women in uniform. You need to run away from this war, this country. Leave the war to the people who have the will to see it through and the country to people who are willing to defend it.

Our country has two enemies: Those who want to destroy us from the outside and those who attempt it from within.

Semper Fi,
J. D. Pendry - Sergeant Major, USMC, Retired

Axis of idiots

As you folks know, I am still letting my brain recover from both meds and H1N1 so my composition vacation continues for now. This was sent to me by a good friend. He hopes it will get passed around and forwarded. I hope you will help us do so.....

"The Axis of Idiots"
From the Podium:
J. D. Pendry, Retired Sergeant Major, USMC

FROM THE PODIUM

This retired USMC Sgt. Major has his Stuff together.

Jimmy Carter, you are the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home, and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You're the "runner-in-chief."

Bill Clinton, you played ring around the Lewinsky while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses to the USS Cole and the First Trade Center Bombing and Our Embassy Bombings emboldened the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately, they grew bolder, until 9/11/2001.

John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute. You lied about American Soldiers in Vietnam . Your military service, like your life, is more
fiction than fact. You've accused our military of terrorizing women and children in Iraq . You called Iraq the wrong war, wrong place, wrong time, and the same words you used to describe Vietnam . You're a fake! You want to run from Iraq and abandon the Iraqis to murderers just as you did to the Vietnamese. Iraq , like Vietnam , is another war that you were for, before you were against it.

John Murtha, you said our military was broken. You said we can't win militarily in Iraq . You accused United States Marines of cold-blooded murder without proof and said we should redeploy to Okinawa . Okinawa, John? And the Democrats call you their military expert! Are you sure you didn't suffer a traumatic brain injury while you were off building your war hero resume? You're a sad, pitiable, corrupt, and washed up old fool. You're not a Marine, sir. You wouldn't amount to a good pimple on a real Marine's ass. You're a phony and a disgrace. Run away, John.

Dick Durbin, you accused our Soldiers at Guantanamo of being Nazis, tenders of Soviet style gulags and as bad as the regime of Pol Pot, who murdered two million of his own people after your party abandoned Southeast Asia to the Communists. Now you want to abandon the Iraqis to the same fate. History was not a good teacher for you, was it? Lord help us! See Dick run.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Carl Levine, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Pat Leahy, Barack Obama, Chuck Schumer, the Hollywood Leftist morons, et al, ad nauseam: Every time you stand in front of television cameras and broadcast to the Islamic Nazis that we went to war because our President lied, that the war is wrong and our Soldiers are torturers, that we should leave Iraq, you give the Islamic butchers - the same ones that tortured and mutilated American Soldiers - cause to think that we'll run away again, and all they have to do is hang on a little longer. It is inevitable that we, the infidels, will have to defeat the Islamic jihadists. Better to do it now on their turf, than later on ours after they have gained both strength and momentum.

American news media, the New York Times particularly: Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods, you become one united with the sub-human pieces of camel dung that torture and mutilate the bodies of American Soldiers. You can't strike up the courage to publish cartoons, but you can help Al Qaeda destroy my country. Actually, you are more dangerous to us than Al Qaeda is. Think about that each time you face Mecca to admire your Pulitzer.

You are America 's 'AXIS OF IDIOTS.' Your Collective Stupidity will destroy us. Self-serving politics and terrorist-abetting news scoops are more important to you than our national security or the lives of innocent civilians and Soldiers It bothers you that defending ourselves gets in the way of your elitist sport of politics and your ignorant editorializing. There is as much blood on your hands as is on the hands of murdering terrorists. Don't ever doubt that. Your frolics will only serve to extend this war as they extended Vietnam . If you want our Soldiers home as you claim, knock off the crap and try supporting your country ahead of supporting your silly political aims and aiding our enemies.

Yes, I'm questioning your patriotism. Your loyalty ends with self. I'm also questioning why you're stealing air that decent Americans could be breathing. You don't deserve the protection of our men and women in uniform. You need to run away from this war, this country. Leave the war to the people who have the will to see it through and the country to people who are willing to defend it.

Our country has two enemies: Those who want to destroy us from the outside and those who attempt it from within.

Semper Fi,
J. D. Pendry - Sergeant Major, USMC, Retired

Chinese media and what we can learn from it.

I'm currrenty watching a doc on History international channel on the new Chinese media and how it is adapting to new open market reforms. The media had been a function of the communist party (The name of the documentary is called China: the dragons ascent and reairs today at 3 eastern today for those intrested.) That is gradually changing. With the current reforms, the media is attempting to function as a mouthpiece between the common people and the govrnment. There is much our media could learn from this as it goes the other way. My advice from having watched the doc....invest in China. They are taking the position in the world that America once held. Sadly, I fear that without major reforms we may be migrating to China soon. The sad part of that is (from a purely historical perspective) of all the places in the world, North and South America have been the least lived on by people and so left most full of natural resources. Less idiotic management of such resources and MORE sensible utilization of such resources would easily restore our place within the world economy. That is one of my biggest gripes with Charlie Crist (R) FL. He opposes all offshore drilling even when the proposal would mean a $5K per year check (according to oil company company commercial) for all Florida homeowners. It was basically the same deal Palin scored for Alaskans on a silver platter. How many recent foreclosures could have been prevented without Crist's opposition to such things. Of course our local media is totally unsupportive of such things. Not to leave our pResident out of this, he recently gave a Brazillian company. recently purchased by GEORGE SOROS millions of dollars to do offshore of expiration for oil. Yesterday, Obama called for stronger environmental protections at the UN. Did our media even attempt to do the same as the new Chinese media would have? Our media has a man crush for lack of a better term with a sniveling two faced (insert your own words here)_____________.

My point here is that China is doing far more with far less and we better follow their lead or we will be left in our own dust.

Chinese media and what we can learn from it.

I'm currrenty watching a doc on History international channel on the new Chinese media and how it is adapting to new open market reforms. The media had been a function of the communist party (The name of the documentary is called China: the dragons ascent and reairs today at 3 eastern today for those intrested.) That is gradually changing. With the current reforms, the media is attempting to function as a mouthpiece between the common people and the govrnment. There is much our media could learn from this as it goes the other way. My advice from having watched the doc....invest in China. They are taking the position in the world that America once held. Sadly, I fear that without major reforms we may be migrating to China soon. The sad part of that is (from a purely historical perspective) of all the places in the world, North and South America have been the least lived on by people and so left most full of natural resources. Less idiotic management of such resources and MORE sensible utilization of such resources would easily restore our place within the world economy. That is one of my biggest gripes with Charlie Crist (R) FL. He opposes all offshore drilling even when the proposal would mean a $5K per year check (according to oil company company commercial) for all Florida homeowners. It was basically the same deal Palin scored for Alaskans on a silver platter. How many recent foreclosures could have been prevented without Crist's opposition to such things. Of course our local media is totally unsupportive of such things. Not to leave our pResident out of this, he recently gave a Brazillian company. recently purchased by GEORGE SOROS millions of dollars to do offshore of expiration for oil. Yesterday, Obama called for stronger environmental protections at the UN. Did our media even attempt to do the same as the new Chinese media would have? Our media has a man crush for lack of a better term with a sniveling two faced (insert your own words here)_____________.

My point here is that China is doing far more with far less and we better follow their lead or we will be left in our own dust.