Friday, May 21, 2010
Depression!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
The Socialist Volcano
The Socialist Volcano
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe
Found this over at Coffee Milk Conservative: Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe, I just started following her blog and have added her to the blogroll. She is a reformed Leftie, so we know it can be done.
As the drumbeat for Cap and Tax starts up again it is important not to forget how silly the whole Anthropogenic Climate Change argument has become and this post highlights that very well. Apparently Air Traffic cools the planet. Who knew? The little vapor trails off of airplanes actually make temperatures go down planet wide (OH, COME ON!)
Correlation is not the same as Causation. Grounding planes after 9/11 did not change WEATHER and it damn sure did not change CLIMATE. Following this logic I could say this: “ I ate a peanut butter sandwich yesterday and the sun shone all day long; therefore eating PB sandwiches makes the weather sunny and bright”. Secondly the GIANT ASH CLOUD *should* make it slightly, if not quite a bit, COOLER; despite the lack of contrails off of airplanes “making it hotter” (never mind that according to their standard fantasies jet exhaust makes the planet hotter). So I guess the question in their minds (as if they used their minds to question anything) is: Will the Man Made warming caused by Jet Exhaust be completely counteracted by the cooling effect of the Volcano (I am waiting for them to figure out a reason for the volcano eruption to be man-caused), and will the absence of the Jet Contrail water vapor contribute to more of a warming effect that the absence of jet exhaust will contribute to a cooling effect? OH MY DEAR LORD -
Anyway, read on:
According to a report in the UK Mail online, the widespread grounding of planes in Europe – due to the eruption of Iceland’s Mount Eyjafjallajokull – could lead to an increase in temperatures across that continent. From the article:
A study conducted after commercial flights were grounded for three days following the September 11 terror attacks found the average daily temperature range in the U.S. rose markedly - exceeding the three-day periods before and after by 1.8c. (or it could have been all that fuel that caught fire… big fire you know, could have made it warmer- hey it is more plausible than their ridiculous “theory”)
The grounding of flights in 2001 gave scientists a 'tarnished but golden opportunity' to study the impact that jet planes have on the climate. (WEATHER WEATHER WEATHER, and the answer is: imperceptible)
They matched the weather over those three days with similar weather in September over that period, and found that the difference in daily high and nightly low temperatures in the absence of planes' contrails was more than 1c greater. (also in the absence of Unicorns, meteor showers, UFO landings, all manner of things that also have no effect on the temperature)
Scientists claimed this showed that clouds formed by the water vapour in the exhaust from jet planes have a small but significant effect on daily temperatures. (one degree C = 1.8 (+32) degree F, really? jet contrails impact national temperature daily by two degrees?)
The researchers said that in regions with crowded skies, the clouds formed by the planes' water vapour worked like cirrus clouds to prevent days from getting too hot and trapping the Earth's heat at night.
I thought the carbon emissions produced by jet fuel contributed to global warming? Now I find out that water vapor – a byproduct of jet fuel combustion – helps to moderate the earth's temperature. Do you ever get the feeling that some people want to have it both ways?
Coffee Milk Conservative: Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe,
My head hurts…
-KOOK
Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe
Found this over at Coffee Milk Conservative: Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe, I just started following her blog and have added her to the blogroll. She is a reformed Leftie, so we know it can be done.
As the drumbeat for Cap and Tax starts up again it is important not to forget how silly the whole Anthropogenic Climate Change argument has become and this post highlights that very well. Apparently Air Traffic cools the planet. Who knew? The little vapor trails off of airplanes actually make temperatures go down planet wide (OH, COME ON!)
Correlation is not the same as Causation. Grounding planes after 9/11 did not change WEATHER and it damn sure did not change CLIMATE. Following this logic I could say this: “ I ate a peanut butter sandwich yesterday and the sun shone all day long; therefore eating PB sandwiches makes the weather sunny and bright”. Secondly the GIANT ASH CLOUD *should* make it slightly, if not quite a bit, COOLER; despite the lack of contrails off of airplanes “making it hotter” (never mind that according to their standard fantasies jet exhaust makes the planet hotter). So I guess the question in their minds (as if they used their minds to question anything) is: Will the Man Made warming caused by Jet Exhaust be completely counteracted by the cooling effect of the Volcano (I am waiting for them to figure out a reason for the volcano eruption to be man-caused), and will the absence of the Jet Contrail water vapor contribute to more of a warming effect that the absence of jet exhaust will contribute to a cooling effect? OH MY DEAR LORD -
Anyway, read on:
According to a report in the UK Mail online, the widespread grounding of planes in Europe – due to the eruption of Iceland’s Mount Eyjafjallajokull – could lead to an increase in temperatures across that continent. From the article:
A study conducted after commercial flights were grounded for three days following the September 11 terror attacks found the average daily temperature range in the U.S. rose markedly - exceeding the three-day periods before and after by 1.8c. (or it could have been all that fuel that caught fire… big fire you know, could have made it warmer- hey it is more plausible than their ridiculous “theory”)
The grounding of flights in 2001 gave scientists a 'tarnished but golden opportunity' to study the impact that jet planes have on the climate. (WEATHER WEATHER WEATHER, and the answer is: imperceptible)
They matched the weather over those three days with similar weather in September over that period, and found that the difference in daily high and nightly low temperatures in the absence of planes' contrails was more than 1c greater. (also in the absence of Unicorns, meteor showers, UFO landings, all manner of things that also have no effect on the temperature)
Scientists claimed this showed that clouds formed by the water vapour in the exhaust from jet planes have a small but significant effect on daily temperatures. (one degree C = 1.8 (+32) degree F, really? jet contrails impact national temperature daily by two degrees?)
The researchers said that in regions with crowded skies, the clouds formed by the planes' water vapour worked like cirrus clouds to prevent days from getting too hot and trapping the Earth's heat at night.
I thought the carbon emissions produced by jet fuel contributed to global warming? Now I find out that water vapor – a byproduct of jet fuel combustion – helps to moderate the earth's temperature. Do you ever get the feeling that some people want to have it both ways?
Coffee Milk Conservative: Suspension of Air Traffic Could Raise Temperatures Across Europe,
My head hurts…
-KOOK
Monday, March 22, 2010
We lost this battle for now, so where do we go from here?
Fellow Americans,
1) Where we are at and 2) what we can do about it, nationally and locally:
1) They did it. They passed it.
Town Halls in August...they didn't listen.
1.7 Million people in Washington DC in September...they didn't listen
Phone, Fax, Emailing......they didn't listen.
Blogging....they didn't listen
More rallies, up until yesterday...they didn't listen.
Instead, we have heard the first shot at us, as Americans, not while we
are confronting the most powerful empire of the 18th Century, not on
Lexington Green but from within the halls of Congress last night.
Instead, the very personal freedom of our nation has been attacked, not by
the air by enemy forces of Japan while our ships are in Pearl Harbor, but
by Congress last night for all of us to see on CSPAN.
Instead, our financial structure has been attacked, not by JihadistMuslims who hijacked four planes on September 11, but by the vote heard
round the world when Congress, last night, has determined to destroy our
failing economy by placing a much larger tax burden on its citizens, all
the while taking away our freedom of control over our own persons and that
of our families.
2) What are we going to do about it?
1) Continue to call your Representative's office in DC, ask for the
scheduler and book a Town Hall for when they return to your District. We
will not go away. They will still hear from us.
2) They needed 216 votes. They obtained 219. It came down to 4 votes.
Currently, there are 4 Congressional Districts without Representatives.
Taxation without Representation.
Nationally, we need your help to obtain one more Conservative vote as thevery next election is April 13th. I am not kidding. Every vote matters
in this insane Congress. Email me that you will commit the next three
weeks to get Edward Lynch into office.
3) This week, conservative candidates running for Congress, who have
stepped up to plate to run against the current traitorous Congress, are on
a national deadline to obtain 4,000+ petitions to get their name on the
ballot. Find out who your conservative candidate is in your District,
call them up and help them obtain those petitions. That will save the
conservative movement $4,350,000. That is money we can use to
effectively fight against thee Progressives.
You decide, $4,350,000 to get conservatives on the ballot or to fight
against the Progressives who have set out to destroy our country.
4) Get in the game. How many of you are still reading and forwarding
emails? Get to your local Republican Executive Committee. There is no
patience for Democrats. Few Blue Dogs held the line. Stupak's block
should be tried as traitors. Let that be a lesson to us, there is no room
for compromise. Help the party that held the line.
How many Independents held the line in Congress? None. That translates
to no third party this year. You want to save your nation or do you want
to make a new sandbox to play in and be ineffective. Get in the game. Do
not waste your vote? Besides, in the primary, Independents have no say.
Last summer, 2-3 million of went to DC for a day. That and all the tea parties and town halls weren't enough.
That was how the antiwar protestors started too, but when that didn't work, they went to DC and stayed hence the term "sit in." We need enough people to go to DC and surround Capitol Hill so they don't get in our out without "our courtesy." The 60s antiwar protestors put DC on lockdown for an entire summer. It got so bad, it made LBJ decide not to run for a second real term as President. If we coordinate with all those going to see Beck and Oreilly, or all the leaders that joined Karin to visit Michael Steele, people could go for a week and rotate in and out. I camped out in my front yard for 2 months after Hurricane Ivan. That was to protect my place from looters and we had no power so it was more comfortable. I believe a "sit in" is the only way that I can think of to make a bigger statement to politicians that this ain't over until they repeal the bill without resorting to unnecessary violence. When the part of this law calling for people to either buy insurance or go to jail, I will be the first one there as I will
never so much as lift a finger because Obama says I have to.
We can all keep up the battle locally as well:
Tonite: All of us Conservatives are going to Broward Republican
Executive Committee to show we are ready to get into the game. Meet
tonite at Sheraton Suites, 6:30 sign in as it starts at 7:00pm. Located
at Cypress Creek Road and Andrews Avenue. Look for each other there.
DC Works For US meetings in Boca and Dade County are tomorrow, March 23rd,
Go to
www.dcworksforus.com for locations and time. Get in the game.
Campaigning for the next Congressional Seat, District 19 - Edward Lynch,
Special Election April 13th.
Obtaining petitions for our fantastic candidates running against
Progressives (two of whom were highlighted by the media yesterday)
Robert Lowry - Candidate in District 19 running against Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz (spoke about Executive Order, yesterday. Also, never
had a live Town Hall)
www.lowryforcongress.com
Bernard Sansaricq - Candidate in District 23 running against Alcee
Hastings (on the Rules Committee, quoted as saying, "Rules....we make them
up as we go along.")
www.sansaricq4congress.org
Allen West - Candidate in District 22 running against Ron Klein, who
didn't have the guts to say which way he was going to vote on the Health
Care Bill. He did not have a live Town Hall, either.
www.allenwestforcongress.com
Corey Poitier - Candidate in District 17 running for seat to be vacated by
Kendrick Meek.
www.poitierforcongress.com
We do not have a moment to loose. More details to follow on how we can be
effective to fight this insanity.
Your fellow patriot,
Karin Hoffman and the DC Works For US team
We lost this battle for now, so where do we go from here?
Fellow Americans,
1) Where we are at and 2) what we can do about it, nationally and locally:
1) They did it. They passed it.
Town Halls in August...they didn't listen.
1.7 Million people in Washington DC in September...they didn't listen
Phone, Fax, Emailing......they didn't listen.
Blogging....they didn't listen
More rallies, up until yesterday...they didn't listen.
Instead, we have heard the first shot at us, as Americans, not while we
are confronting the most powerful empire of the 18th Century, not on
Lexington Green but from within the halls of Congress last night.
Instead, the very personal freedom of our nation has been attacked, not by
the air by enemy forces of Japan while our ships are in Pearl Harbor, but
by Congress last night for all of us to see on CSPAN.
Instead, our financial structure has been attacked, not by JihadistMuslims who hijacked four planes on September 11, but by the vote heard
round the world when Congress, last night, has determined to destroy our
failing economy by placing a much larger tax burden on its citizens, all
the while taking away our freedom of control over our own persons and that
of our families.
2) What are we going to do about it?
1) Continue to call your Representative's office in DC, ask for the
scheduler and book a Town Hall for when they return to your District. We
will not go away. They will still hear from us.
2) They needed 216 votes. They obtained 219. It came down to 4 votes.
Currently, there are 4 Congressional Districts without Representatives.
Taxation without Representation.
Nationally, we need your help to obtain one more Conservative vote as thevery next election is April 13th. I am not kidding. Every vote matters
in this insane Congress. Email me that you will commit the next three
weeks to get Edward Lynch into office.
3) This week, conservative candidates running for Congress, who have
stepped up to plate to run against the current traitorous Congress, are on
a national deadline to obtain 4,000+ petitions to get their name on the
ballot. Find out who your conservative candidate is in your District,
call them up and help them obtain those petitions. That will save the
conservative movement $4,350,000. That is money we can use to
effectively fight against thee Progressives.
You decide, $4,350,000 to get conservatives on the ballot or to fight
against the Progressives who have set out to destroy our country.
4) Get in the game. How many of you are still reading and forwarding
emails? Get to your local Republican Executive Committee. There is no
patience for Democrats. Few Blue Dogs held the line. Stupak's block
should be tried as traitors. Let that be a lesson to us, there is no room
for compromise. Help the party that held the line.
How many Independents held the line in Congress? None. That translates
to no third party this year. You want to save your nation or do you want
to make a new sandbox to play in and be ineffective. Get in the game. Do
not waste your vote? Besides, in the primary, Independents have no say.
Last summer, 2-3 million of went to DC for a day. That and all the tea parties and town halls weren't enough.
That was how the antiwar protestors started too, but when that didn't work, they went to DC and stayed hence the term "sit in." We need enough people to go to DC and surround Capitol Hill so they don't get in our out without "our courtesy." The 60s antiwar protestors put DC on lockdown for an entire summer. It got so bad, it made LBJ decide not to run for a second real term as President. If we coordinate with all those going to see Beck and Oreilly, or all the leaders that joined Karin to visit Michael Steele, people could go for a week and rotate in and out. I camped out in my front yard for 2 months after Hurricane Ivan. That was to protect my place from looters and we had no power so it was more comfortable. I believe a "sit in" is the only way that I can think of to make a bigger statement to politicians that this ain't over until they repeal the bill without resorting to unnecessary violence. When the part of this law calling for people to either buy insurance or go to jail, I will be the first one there as I will
never so much as lift a finger because Obama says I have to.
We can all keep up the battle locally as well:
Tonite: All of us Conservatives are going to Broward Republican
Executive Committee to show we are ready to get into the game. Meet
tonite at Sheraton Suites, 6:30 sign in as it starts at 7:00pm. Located
at Cypress Creek Road and Andrews Avenue. Look for each other there.
DC Works For US meetings in Boca and Dade County are tomorrow, March 23rd,
Go to
www.dcworksforus.com for locations and time. Get in the game.
Campaigning for the next Congressional Seat, District 19 - Edward Lynch,
Special Election April 13th.
Obtaining petitions for our fantastic candidates running against
Progressives (two of whom were highlighted by the media yesterday)
Robert Lowry - Candidate in District 19 running against Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz (spoke about Executive Order, yesterday. Also, never
had a live Town Hall)
www.lowryforcongress.com
Bernard Sansaricq - Candidate in District 23 running against Alcee
Hastings (on the Rules Committee, quoted as saying, "Rules....we make them
up as we go along.")
www.sansaricq4congress.org
Allen West - Candidate in District 22 running against Ron Klein, who
didn't have the guts to say which way he was going to vote on the Health
Care Bill. He did not have a live Town Hall, either.
www.allenwestforcongress.com
Corey Poitier - Candidate in District 17 running for seat to be vacated by
Kendrick Meek.
www.poitierforcongress.com
We do not have a moment to loose. More details to follow on how we can be
effective to fight this insanity.
Your fellow patriot,
Karin Hoffman and the DC Works For US team
Sunday, March 21, 2010
A Storm is coming...
to crossing that line, so I say...a storm is coming much like this one that I stood in and filmed while Pelotox spoke (I figured the lightning and hail were less dangerousbeliefs
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Viral of the DAY: real economic stimulus!!!
The Fix
There recently was an article in the St. Petersburg Fl. Times. The Business Section asked readers for ideas on: "How Would You Fix the Economy?"
I think this guy nailed it!
_____
Dear Mr. President,
Please find below my suggestion for fixing America 's economy. Instead of giving billions of dollars to companies that will squander the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan. You can call it the "Patriotic Retirement Plan":
There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force. Pay them $1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:
1) They MUST retire. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They MUST buy a new American CAR. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.
3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.
It can't get any easier than that!!
Mr. President, while you're at it, make Congress retire on Social Security and Medicare. I'll bet both programs would be fixed pronto!
PS. If more money is needed, have all members in Congress pay their taxes...
If you think this would work, please forward to everyone you know
Viral of the DAY: real economic stimulus!!!
The Fix
There recently was an article in the St. Petersburg Fl. Times. The Business Section asked readers for ideas on: "How Would You Fix the Economy?"
I think this guy nailed it!
_____
Dear Mr. President,
Please find below my suggestion for fixing America 's economy. Instead of giving billions of dollars to companies that will squander the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan. You can call it the "Patriotic Retirement Plan":
There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force. Pay them $1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:
1) They MUST retire. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They MUST buy a new American CAR. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.
3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.
It can't get any easier than that!!
Mr. President, while you're at it, make Congress retire on Social Security and Medicare. I'll bet both programs would be fixed pronto!
PS. If more money is needed, have all members in Congress pay their taxes...
If you think this would work, please forward to everyone you know
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
"Fundamental Transformation of America pt. 3 (the real threat))
How bad did the UN get and what is the greatest threat of our time?
Up until now we have watched the UN devolve from a quasi-decent organization to a statist supporting, anti freedom agency but that is only part of the story. The UN has become the most corrupt, genocidal, terrorism supporting organization.
1950 was a major turning point in the U.N and it's future. The Korean war broke out with little if any attempts from the UN to stop it. The U.S.S.R. withdrew as they were using their own pilots in the air war over Korea.
Under the UN Charter, Hungary was in independent nation free of Soviet control thanks to a revolution. The UN agreed to support Hungarian independence. However, when the Soviets surrounded Budapest and began systematically killing it's residents, the UN did nothing.
While the Hungary incident was happening the US, Britain. France, and Israel took action to retake the Suez Canal which belonged to those nations by treaty, (those were the nations, excluding Israel, who paid for the land and paid to build the canal. In the melee after WW2, Egypt took the canal by force. The U.N strongly condemned actions by the US, Britain and France while ignoring the U.S.S.R. which was openly engaging in genocide in Hungary.
On 10/16/62, a U2 spy plane flying over Cuba (probably not spying though) discovered Soviet made SS4 mid-range (1200 mile) nuclear warhead capable missiles. This put Miami, New Orleans, Dallas and even DC could be wiped off the map at the press of a button. Kennedy, who openly mistrusted the UN, told the American people about the Cuban Missile Crisis on 10/22, and unveiled spy photos to the UN on 10/26, (again taken by a U2 that was NOT spying) The UN did nothing while the world sat on the brink of a Nuclear apocalypse.
After the Cuban Missile crisis, where the US took the high road, the UN called America a "colonialist power".
Israel: The UN, through rewritten history claims to have created Israel but it did nothing to stop Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Egypt from an attempted in invasion in 1948-49. Then in the 1967 war, the Egyptian army massed on Israel's border, started shelling it's cities, at the same time Syria did the same. As if that wasn't enough, Syria accused Israel of invading, and the UN condemned Israel for the non invasion and shooting down 6 syrian Mig 21s over Israeli airspace. Then the UN withdrew it's "UNICEF" peacekeepers and open war broke out.
After ignoring, and then triggering the 6 day war, where they expected Israel to lose, shock set in when the Israelis opened a can of whupass on all of it's neighbors all the way to Yemen. Then the UN decided to play an active role in deciding post war diplomacy (who got what land that Isreal had taken.) The poor decision making in this area led to the "Yom Kippur War." For 20 years, the UN tried to get Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 borders with no success.
The UN moral court.
Fast forward to 1998...The UN while allowing genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, etc. the UN put forward the "Rome Statute." This statute set up a court system that could reach into any member state and remove their citizens based on a claim lodged by any other member nation. this was the first UN body that could supersede US sovereignty. This was the first time since 1776 that US citizens would have to answer to a power that did not answer to them in any way. This actually defied the original UN Charter from 1946. The wording in the Rome Statute was not done as well as needed, so it was toothless to stop actual genocide but U.S. troops and politicians are easily prosecuted for "war crimes". So Milosevic was able to execute untold thousands of Bosnians, at the same time Saddam Hussein was gassing the Kurds, and the UN did nothing. It took years to prosecute Milosevic but would take days if it were a US General. In his final act as President, Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute. The first thing Bush (43) as President did was notified the UN that our signing of the Rome Statute was null and void.
Now the UN has adopted the most dangerous and evil concept of all: "Moral Equivalence". this concept blurs the line between aggressors and victims even farther. Victims of terrorism or genocide can actually be held equally responsible for actions of aggressors. This adopts the lowest common denominator to to get the biggest consensus possible on whatever issue they take up.
Why is this a threat?
Now we have Barack Hussein Obama as President. What is the president? The President is the commander in chief of the military. He can do as he chooses regarding military assets. He can invade a country without any agreement from Congress for 6 weeks. So how does this affect the "fundamental transformation of America?" While we are busy watching the House and Senate, posting on our blogs about Obama's failures, he could be quietly transferring military assets (planes tanks etc.) to UN control and nobody would know but Obama's inner circle. Imagine the horror that would be brought on the world if this was his real transformation. Our Nuclear Arsenal could wind up in the hands of genocidal maniacs at the UN and we would not even realize it until one day we wake up and the UN is running the show. We know Obama is trying to destroy our monetary system at the same time the E.U. is facing financial collapse. So, if I can recognize this, do you think the folks pulling Obama's strings can't? Also, think about this, Obama is reshuffling troops and gear between Iraq and Afganistan. Given how well this administration blurs the numbers regarding finances, would it be that hard to lose some military hardware out in the desert where there is nothing but dirt such as Afganistan and Iraq?
If this is happening, the last thing you may see is an M1A1 Abrams tank that you helped pay for with UN logos on it crushing you inside your car. Think about this the next time you vote for a "commander in chief" of our military.
Info for this 3 part post came from various internet sources along with the book "Tower of Babble: How the UN has fueled global chaos" (2004) by Dore Gold (UN ambassador to Israel from 1997 to 1999).
"Fundamental Transformation of America pt. 3 (the real threat))
How bad did the UN get and what is the greatest threat of our time?
Up until now we have watched the UN devolve from a quasi-decent organization to a statist supporting, anti freedom agency but that is only part of the story. The UN has become the most corrupt, genocidal, terrorism supporting organization.
1950 was a major turning point in the U.N and it's future. The Korean war broke out with little if any attempts from the UN to stop it. The U.S.S.R. withdrew as they were using their own pilots in the air war over Korea.
Under the UN Charter, Hungary was in independent nation free of Soviet control thanks to a revolution. The UN agreed to support Hungarian independence. However, when the Soviets surrounded Budapest and began systematically killing it's residents, the UN did nothing.
While the Hungary incident was happening the US, Britain. France, and Israel took action to retake the Suez Canal which belonged to those nations by treaty, (those were the nations, excluding Israel, who paid for the land and paid to build the canal. In the melee after WW2, Egypt took the canal by force. The U.N strongly condemned actions by the US, Britain and France while ignoring the U.S.S.R. which was openly engaging in genocide in Hungary.
On 10/16/62, a U2 spy plane flying over Cuba (probably not spying though) discovered Soviet made SS4 mid-range (1200 mile) nuclear warhead capable missiles. This put Miami, New Orleans, Dallas and even DC could be wiped off the map at the press of a button. Kennedy, who openly mistrusted the UN, told the American people about the Cuban Missile Crisis on 10/22, and unveiled spy photos to the UN on 10/26, (again taken by a U2 that was NOT spying) The UN did nothing while the world sat on the brink of a Nuclear apocalypse.
After the Cuban Missile crisis, where the US took the high road, the UN called America a "colonialist power".
Israel: The UN, through rewritten history claims to have created Israel but it did nothing to stop Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Egypt from an attempted in invasion in 1948-49. Then in the 1967 war, the Egyptian army massed on Israel's border, started shelling it's cities, at the same time Syria did the same. As if that wasn't enough, Syria accused Israel of invading, and the UN condemned Israel for the non invasion and shooting down 6 syrian Mig 21s over Israeli airspace. Then the UN withdrew it's "UNICEF" peacekeepers and open war broke out.
After ignoring, and then triggering the 6 day war, where they expected Israel to lose, shock set in when the Israelis opened a can of whupass on all of it's neighbors all the way to Yemen. Then the UN decided to play an active role in deciding post war diplomacy (who got what land that Isreal had taken.) The poor decision making in this area led to the "Yom Kippur War." For 20 years, the UN tried to get Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 borders with no success.
The UN moral court.
Fast forward to 1998...The UN while allowing genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, etc. the UN put forward the "Rome Statute." This statute set up a court system that could reach into any member state and remove their citizens based on a claim lodged by any other member nation. this was the first UN body that could supersede US sovereignty. This was the first time since 1776 that US citizens would have to answer to a power that did not answer to them in any way. This actually defied the original UN Charter from 1946. The wording in the Rome Statute was not done as well as needed, so it was toothless to stop actual genocide but U.S. troops and politicians are easily prosecuted for "war crimes". So Milosevic was able to execute untold thousands of Bosnians, at the same time Saddam Hussein was gassing the Kurds, and the UN did nothing. It took years to prosecute Milosevic but would take days if it were a US General. In his final act as President, Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute. The first thing Bush (43) as President did was notified the UN that our signing of the Rome Statute was null and void.
Now the UN has adopted the most dangerous and evil concept of all: "Moral Equivalence". this concept blurs the line between aggressors and victims even farther. Victims of terrorism or genocide can actually be held equally responsible for actions of aggressors. This adopts the lowest common denominator to to get the biggest consensus possible on whatever issue they take up.
Why is this a threat?
Now we have Barack Hussein Obama as President. What is the president? The President is the commander in chief of the military. He can do as he chooses regarding military assets. He can invade a country without any agreement from Congress for 6 weeks. So how does this affect the "fundamental transformation of America?" While we are busy watching the House and Senate, posting on our blogs about Obama's failures, he could be quietly transferring military assets (planes tanks etc.) to UN control and nobody would know but Obama's inner circle. Imagine the horror that would be brought on the world if this was his real transformation. Our Nuclear Arsenal could wind up in the hands of genocidal maniacs at the UN and we would not even realize it until one day we wake up and the UN is running the show. We know Obama is trying to destroy our monetary system at the same time the E.U. is facing financial collapse. So, if I can recognize this, do you think the folks pulling Obama's strings can't? Also, think about this, Obama is reshuffling troops and gear between Iraq and Afganistan. Given how well this administration blurs the numbers regarding finances, would it be that hard to lose some military hardware out in the desert where there is nothing but dirt such as Afganistan and Iraq?
If this is happening, the last thing you may see is an M1A1 Abrams tank that you helped pay for with UN logos on it crushing you inside your car. Think about this the next time you vote for a "commander in chief" of our military.
Info for this 3 part post came from various internet sources along with the book "Tower of Babble: How the UN has fueled global chaos" (2004) by Dore Gold (UN ambassador to Israel from 1997 to 1999).
Monday, February 15, 2010
Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)
Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.
Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained
Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.
UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.
Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.
Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.
Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.
By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)
Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.
Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.
Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of
self determination"
Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."
Transformation of America pt2 (Decay)
Among first acts of UN was a "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" act.
Russia and eastern bloc nations abstained
Critics complained that the UN had a "completely western" clarity of purpose despite having members such as India, Ethiopia Egypt and Turkey. (Christians, Muslims Hindus and Jews.
UN went from 51 member states in '48, to 83 in'59 to 132 in '72 to 184 by 1993. One of the before mentioned to loopholes allowed for the addition of authoritarian children of the USSR and China and Fundamentalist Islamist regimes. By the time the this had happened only 75 out of 184 were free democracies, the rest being dictatorships. They were able to vote in rules using the loopholes set by Russia during the founding of the U.N. Charter.
Now we had a U.N where 2/3rds of the member states (now known as the nonaligned union) that were dictatorial in nature that represented less than half the worlds population.
Support for the U.S. eroded from 50.1% that voted with the US in 1995 but by 1999 only 41.8% voted wit the US. The stated reason for this was that U.S interests were divergent with the interests of dictatorial interests of such members.
Early in the lifespan of the UN, authoritarian regimes did not have much power or say so in U.N affairs but by the 90s, the U.N had gerrymandered itself to the point where statists ran the show and the nations not involved in genocide or nuclear proliferation were outvoted.
By 1950, Dean Achenson (Secretary of State under Truman) said the UN charter was a huge mistake, and even President Truman who was among the biggest advocates for the UN had decided it was a big mistake. One big reason for this as the Veto power of the USSR which had become a cold war adversary. The U.N. Security Council was effectively neutralized because any proposal by the USA was vetoed by the USSR and Vice-Versa. It was believed that with the fall of the USSR, that the deadlock in the Security Council would change but that was not the case. (Could it be because all the European Nations on the security council are now socialists?)
Among the first US Presidents to become an open critic of the UN was JFK. This happened over the "Goa incident." In the "Goa Incident", India attacked a small enclave left over form the colonial era that was under the control of Portugal. No attempt was ever made to negotiate i.e. ask Portugal to leave. Instead Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru resorted to armed force. To justify the use of force, India claimed that Goa was Indian land by law. The said law was UN resolution 1514 which advocated decolonization of African and Asian states. The original draft resolution called for the establishment of representative governments in their places but this was blocked by the Statist regimes, so the actual law allowed for the establishment of dictatorial regimes in the place of withdrawing colonies.
Think of all the parts of the world impacted by this resolution from Iraq to N.Korea to Somalia, etc. Exempt from this resolution were the Eastern Bloc soviet satellite states as they were declared sovreign states despite the fact that Moscow had full control of all aspects of the lives of those populations. Had America had leaders with any sort of spine when the U.N. was created, our States would each have a vote just as the Soviet States do. So the "Goa incident" forced the U.N. to redefine the term "aggression" Bottom line: the U.N. basically ignored the whole incident because it was "too involved" in the Nuremburg and Tokyo military trials.
Following the "Goa incident" the Soviets began working on more restrictive definitions of "aggression designed to prevent any western response to the spread of Communism. Meanwhile, third world countries insisted that "aggression" must not be interpreted as "limiting the scope of the right of a people's self determination." By 1974 this rule was expanded to property rights of corporations, meanwhile any country that wanted could initiate "aggression" against it's neighbors as a "right of
self determination"
Next we will discuss the UN support of the nations it created and terrorism the UN allowed and endorsed regarding those states. There is a major point to this regarding the current administration and the promised "fundamental change."
Friday, February 12, 2010
Viral of the day: Anatomy of a failed President: Warning PG13!!!
The following is an interesting article.. I wonder how long Dr. Hunt can remain at NIH once the powers that be get wind of this article.
Another Failed Presidency
An article from American Thinker
Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson.
But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of precedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?
Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.
In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us --- financiers, energy producers,
"For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."
Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state ---staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.
Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
