How bad did the UN get and what is the greatest threat of our time?
Up until now we have watched the UN devolve from a quasi-decent organization to a statist supporting, anti freedom agency but that is only part of the story. The UN has become the most corrupt, genocidal, terrorism supporting organization.
1950 was a major turning point in the U.N and it's future. The Korean war broke out with little if any attempts from the UN to stop it. The U.S.S.R. withdrew as they were using their own pilots in the air war over Korea.
Under the UN Charter, Hungary was in independent nation free of Soviet control thanks to a revolution. The UN agreed to support Hungarian independence. However, when the Soviets surrounded Budapest and began systematically killing it's residents, the UN did nothing.
While the Hungary incident was happening the US, Britain. France, and Israel took action to retake the Suez Canal which belonged to those nations by treaty, (those were the nations, excluding Israel, who paid for the land and paid to build the canal. In the melee after WW2, Egypt took the canal by force. The U.N strongly condemned actions by the US, Britain and France while ignoring the U.S.S.R. which was openly engaging in genocide in Hungary.
On 10/16/62, a U2 spy plane flying over Cuba (probably not spying though) discovered Soviet made SS4 mid-range (1200 mile) nuclear warhead capable missiles. This put Miami, New Orleans, Dallas and even DC could be wiped off the map at the press of a button. Kennedy, who openly mistrusted the UN, told the American people about the Cuban Missile Crisis on 10/22, and unveiled spy photos to the UN on 10/26, (again taken by a U2 that was NOT spying) The UN did nothing while the world sat on the brink of a Nuclear apocalypse.
After the Cuban Missile crisis, where the US took the high road, the UN called America a "colonialist power".
Israel: The UN, through rewritten history claims to have created Israel but it did nothing to stop Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Egypt from an attempted in invasion in 1948-49. Then in the 1967 war, the Egyptian army massed on Israel's border, started shelling it's cities, at the same time Syria did the same. As if that wasn't enough, Syria accused Israel of invading, and the UN condemned Israel for the non invasion and shooting down 6 syrian Mig 21s over Israeli airspace. Then the UN withdrew it's "UNICEF" peacekeepers and open war broke out.
After ignoring, and then triggering the 6 day war, where they expected Israel to lose, shock set in when the Israelis opened a can of whupass on all of it's neighbors all the way to Yemen. Then the UN decided to play an active role in deciding post war diplomacy (who got what land that Isreal had taken.) The poor decision making in this area led to the "Yom Kippur War." For 20 years, the UN tried to get Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 borders with no success.
The UN moral court.
Fast forward to 1998...The UN while allowing genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, etc. the UN put forward the "Rome Statute." This statute set up a court system that could reach into any member state and remove their citizens based on a claim lodged by any other member nation. this was the first UN body that could supersede US sovereignty. This was the first time since 1776 that US citizens would have to answer to a power that did not answer to them in any way. This actually defied the original UN Charter from 1946. The wording in the Rome Statute was not done as well as needed, so it was toothless to stop actual genocide but U.S. troops and politicians are easily prosecuted for "war crimes". So Milosevic was able to execute untold thousands of Bosnians, at the same time Saddam Hussein was gassing the Kurds, and the UN did nothing. It took years to prosecute Milosevic but would take days if it were a US General. In his final act as President, Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute. The first thing Bush (43) as President did was notified the UN that our signing of the Rome Statute was null and void.
Now the UN has adopted the most dangerous and evil concept of all: "Moral Equivalence". this concept blurs the line between aggressors and victims even farther. Victims of terrorism or genocide can actually be held equally responsible for actions of aggressors. This adopts the lowest common denominator to to get the biggest consensus possible on whatever issue they take up.
Why is this a threat?
Now we have Barack Hussein Obama as President. What is the president? The President is the commander in chief of the military. He can do as he chooses regarding military assets. He can invade a country without any agreement from Congress for 6 weeks. So how does this affect the "fundamental transformation of America?" While we are busy watching the House and Senate, posting on our blogs about Obama's failures, he could be quietly transferring military assets (planes tanks etc.) to UN control and nobody would know but Obama's inner circle. Imagine the horror that would be brought on the world if this was his real transformation. Our Nuclear Arsenal could wind up in the hands of genocidal maniacs at the UN and we would not even realize it until one day we wake up and the UN is running the show. We know Obama is trying to destroy our monetary system at the same time the E.U. is facing financial collapse. So, if I can recognize this, do you think the folks pulling Obama's strings can't? Also, think about this, Obama is reshuffling troops and gear between Iraq and Afganistan. Given how well this administration blurs the numbers regarding finances, would it be that hard to lose some military hardware out in the desert where there is nothing but dirt such as Afganistan and Iraq?
If this is happening, the last thing you may see is an M1A1 Abrams tank that you helped pay for with UN logos on it crushing you inside your car. Think about this the next time you vote for a "commander in chief" of our military.
Info for this 3 part post came from various internet sources along with the book "Tower of Babble: How the UN has fueled global chaos" (2004) by Dore Gold (UN ambassador to Israel from 1997 to 1999).
No comments:
Post a Comment