LIMBAUGH VS POLANSKI (LIBERAL HYPOSCRISY 101)

I have not had much to say about the whole Limbaugh football fiasco until now asI didn't have a unique perspective on it. Kook has done a fantastic job on that issue and I am not going to trash this blog by writing an inferior story on a subject that Kook has already covered so well. Today. however I do have a unique perspective, thanks to Dr Dave filling in a blank for me quite by accident.

First we will look at Roman Polanski....He is a hollywood insider who drugged and raped a 15 year old girl using alcohol and 'ludes which were the 70s equivalent of roofies now. After his conviction and awaiting sentencing, Polanski fled to Europe and then made a small fortune writing literature of various types. He often made a show of how he beat the U.S. legal system by showing up anywhere Europe's elites would be seen. Well 20 years later Polanski went to the wrong country and got caught. Now every liberal group under the lack of a God or so they believe is calling for Polanski to be freed. They feel that since it was 20 years ago, that makes it okay...or so they say. I think it is something else and I am about to explain why.

Now look at Rush Limbaugh. He has made a fortune doing radio. He is a conservative which to the American communist makes him an evil greedy racist hellbent on destroying the planet and killing all minorities. Now in either '99 or 2000, Limbaugh said that Donovan Mcnabb is an overrated Quaterback because the media wants to see a "black quarterback" succeed in the NFL. Limbaugh made clear that he thought McNabb was good, just not the second coming of Joe Montana or Dan Marino like the press was making him out to be. Now let me ask you this, almost 10 years has passed since Limbaugh said that, but lets go one step farther. If Rush quit doing his show, got out of politics and 20 years passed, would Hollywood and the media treat him like Polanski??? I rest my case.